fix(server): serialize PromptMetadataStore access with a lock

Addresses comfyanonymous's review nit on PR #13905. The store is touched
from three threads — the aiohttp event loop (``register`` via
``post_prompt``), the worker thread (``unregister`` via the
``prompt_worker`` try/finally and ``execution_error`` paths), and any
thread that fires ``send_sync`` (``inject``). Individual ``dict``
operations are GIL-atomic but ``register``'s ``len -> pop -> setitem``
and ``inject``'s ``get -> {**a, **b}`` are multi-step compounds whose
interleaving without a lock is racy. A single ``threading.Lock`` keeps
the FIFO cap honest and snapshots the envelope under the lock before
the spread runs.

Adds a stress-test that runs concurrent register/unregister/inject for
100 ms across five threads and asserts no exception escapes and the
capacity bound is held.

app/prompt_metadata.py

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ instance and the helpers can be unit-tested without the rest of the app.
 from __future__ import annotations
 
 import logging
+import threading
 from typing import Any, Callable, Optional
 
 
@@ -177,28 +178,49 @@ class PromptMetadataStore:
     prompt finishes, wiped on queue cancel/delete. The FIFO cap is a
     backstop: if any cleanup hook is ever skipped, the store sheds the
     oldest entry instead of growing without bound.
+
+    Access is serialized through a ``threading.Lock``. ``register`` runs
+    on the aiohttp event-loop thread, ``unregister`` runs on the
+    ``prompt_worker`` thread, and ``inject`` runs on whichever thread
+    fires ``send_sync`` (event loop, worker, asset seeder). Individual
+    ``dict`` ops are GIL-atomic, but ``register``'s
+    ``len() -> pop -> __setitem__`` and ``inject``'s ``get -> {**a, **b}``
+    are multi-step compounds whose interleaving without a lock is
+    racy. The lock is uncontended in steady state (sub-microsecond
+    critical sections) so the cost is negligible.
     """
 
     def __init__(self, capacity: int = DEFAULT_STORE_CAPACITY):
         self._envelopes: dict[str, dict] = {}
         self._capacity = capacity
+        self._lock = threading.Lock()
 
     def register(self, prompt_id: str, extra_data: Any) -> None:
         envelope = extract_envelope_from_extra_data(extra_data)
         if envelope is None:
             return
-        if len(self._envelopes) >= self._capacity:
-            self._envelopes.pop(next(iter(self._envelopes)))
-        self._envelopes[prompt_id] = envelope
+        with self._lock:
+            if len(self._envelopes) >= self._capacity:
+                self._envelopes.pop(next(iter(self._envelopes)))
+            self._envelopes[prompt_id] = envelope
 
     def unregister(self, prompt_id: str) -> None:
-        self._envelopes.pop(prompt_id, None)
+        with self._lock:
+            self._envelopes.pop(prompt_id, None)
 
     def inject(self, data: Any) -> Any:
-        return inject_envelope(data, self._envelopes.get)
+        # Snapshot the envelope under the lock so the spread in
+        # ``inject_envelope`` runs against a consistent view even if a
+        # concurrent ``register``/``unregister`` is mutating the map.
+        def locked_lookup(prompt_id: str) -> Optional[dict]:
+            with self._lock:
+                return self._envelopes.get(prompt_id)
+        return inject_envelope(data, locked_lookup)
 
     def __len__(self) -> int:
-        return len(self._envelopes)
+        with self._lock:
+            return len(self._envelopes)
 
     def __contains__(self, prompt_id: str) -> bool:
-        return prompt_id in self._envelopes
+        with self._lock:
+            return prompt_id in self._envelopes

tests-unit/app_test/test_prompt_metadata.py

@@ -348,3 +348,65 @@ class TestPromptMetadataStore:
             "prompt_id": "p1",
             "workflow_id": "wf-1",
         })
+
+    def test_concurrent_access_does_not_corrupt_or_raise(self):
+        """Smoke test for the store's lock. ``register`` is called from
+        the aiohttp event-loop thread, ``unregister`` from the worker
+        thread, and ``inject`` fires on every ``send_sync`` from
+        whichever thread emits the event. Run all three concurrently
+        and assert no exception escapes and the store stays internally
+        consistent (the FIFO cap is never exceeded)."""
+        import threading
+
+        store = PromptMetadataStore(capacity=64)
+        stop = threading.Event()
+        errors: list[BaseException] = []
+
+        def registrar():
+            i = 0
+            try:
+                while not stop.is_set():
+                    store.register(
+                        f"p{i % 100}",
+                        {"metadata": {"workflow_id": f"wf-{i}"}},
+                    )
+                    i += 1
+            except BaseException as e:
+                errors.append(e)
+
+        def canceller():
+            i = 0
+            try:
+                while not stop.is_set():
+                    store.unregister(f"p{i % 100}")
+                    i += 1
+            except BaseException as e:
+                errors.append(e)
+
+        def injector():
+            i = 0
+            try:
+                while not stop.is_set():
+                    store.inject({"prompt_id": f"p{i % 100}", "node": "5"})
+                    i += 1
+            except BaseException as e:
+                errors.append(e)
+
+        threads = [
+            threading.Thread(target=registrar),
+            threading.Thread(target=registrar),
+            threading.Thread(target=canceller),
+            threading.Thread(target=injector),
+            threading.Thread(target=injector),
+        ]
+        for t in threads:
+            t.start()
+        # Brief burst — long enough to interleave many ops, short enough
+        # not to slow CI.
+        threading.Event().wait(0.1)
+        stop.set()
+        for t in threads:
+            t.join(timeout=2.0)
+
+        assert errors == [], f"concurrent access raised: {errors[:3]}"
+        assert len(store) <= 64, "FIFO cap was breached under contention"